Peter Vallentyne: Interest-protecting vs. choice-protecting rights

Datum: 25 maj 2016
Tid: 10:00–12:00

Peter Vallentyne, Florence G. Kline Professor at the Department of Philosophy, University of Missouri

A person is wronged when her rights are infringed, but when exactly are rights infringed? The most common account is choice-protecting and hold that rights are infringed when they are intruded upon without the rightholder consent. By contrast, a direct interest-protecting account holds that they are infringed when intruded upon against the rightholder’s interests. I will propose and partially defend a hybrid account that holds that whether rights (whatever their general content) are infringed depends, in a particular way, on (1) actual valid consent/dissent, (2) hypothetical consent/dissent, and (3) the impact on the rightholder’s interests.  

Download the paper here (doc)

His research areas are ethics, social and political philosophy.

See Peter talk on the topic of equality and animals.

Seminariet hålls på hos oss på Holländargatan 13. Ingen föranmälan krävs. Välkommen!

Vill du få påminnelser om våra forskarseminarier? Prenumerera här.

Tidigare aktiviteter och dokumentation