Search Results for:
doktoral
03 May, 2019
Wlodek Rabinowicz

Wlodek Rabinowicz

I am senior professor of practical philosophy at Lund University. After defending my doctoral dissertation in Uppsala in 1979, I remained there as associate professor in practical philosophy. 1994-95  and a former editor of and .

Senior Professor, Practical Philosophy
Read more
05 April, 2024
Paolo Velásquez

Paolo Velásquez

I am a researcher at the Institute for Futures Studies and the University of Oxford'sCentre on Migration, Policy and Society (COMPAS).I am also affiliated to the Center for Responsible Leadership at t

PhD, Sociology
Read more
09 March, 2022
Lily Wahlman

Lily Wahlman

I work with criminology professor Jerzy Sarnecki, in the project "Effects of SIG in Stockholm". The aim of the project is to improve the state of knowledge about social action groups (SIG). SIG is a m

Master's degree in Criminology
Read more
21 December, 2023
Andrea S. Asker

Andrea S. Asker

I am a researcher at the Institute for Futures Studies and will be conducting a postdoctoral research project within the philosophy of death at Hitotsubashi University in Tokyo during the fall of 2025

PhD, Philosophy
Read more
28 August, 2015

Sophie Nachemson-Ekwall: Reinventing the Swedish public corporation for the 21st Century

Sophie Nachemson-Ekwall, Center for Governance and Management Studies at Stockholm School of Economics ABSTRACTTaking an organisational perspective on mergers and acquisitions Sophie Nachemson-Ekwall d', SNS förlag.

Sophie Nachemson-Ekwall, Center for Governance and Management Studies at Stockholm School of Economics
Read more
11 December, 2019

Democracy and the Common Good: A Study of the Weighted Majority Rule

Doctoral thesis in practical philosophy, Stockholm: Department of Philosophy, Stockholm University. Abstract In this study I analyse the performance of a democratic decision-making rule: the weighted ma

Type of publication: Journal articles | Berndt, Katharina
Read more
12 December, 2014

Human enhancement and technological uncertainty

It's hard to know where the knowledge we acquire and the technology we develop may take us. Sometimes it is not until after several years that we learn how these skills or technologies can benefit - o

Read more
03 November, 2021
Josef Hien

Josef Hien

I am interested in the connection between politico-economic institutions, religion, ideologies, and cultures. After receiving my PhD from the European University Institute in Florence in 2012 I had po

Researcher in political science
Read more
15 January, 2020

Completed: Written meaning

The purpose of the project is to stimulate and discuss knowledge-based text production alongside the dominant academic formats, to contribute to more animated writing and readable texts by scholars, and thereby enlarge their audience.

Read more
06 September, 2019

Lukas H. Meyer: Fairness is most relevant for country shares of the remaining carbon budget

Lukas H. Meyer, Professor of Philosophy at the University of Graz, Austria, and Speaker of the Field of Excellence Climate Change Graz, the Doctoral Programme Climate Change, and the Working Unit MoraIn my talk I argue that fairness concerns are decisive for eventual cumulative emission allocations shown in terms of quantified national shares.I will show that major fairness concerns are quantitatively critical for the allocation of the global carbon budget across countries. The budget is limited by the aim of staying well below 2°C. Minimal fairness requirements include securing basic needs, attributing historical responsibility for past emissions, accounting for benefits from past emissions, and not exceeding countries’ societally feasible emission reduction rate. The argument in favor of taking into account these fairness concerns reflects a critique of both simple equality and staged approaches, the former demanding the equal-per-capita distribution from now on, the latter preserving the inequality of the status-quo levels of emissions for the transformation period. I argue that the overall most plausible approach is a four-fold qualified version of the equal-per-capita view that incorporates the legitimate reasons for grandfathering.

Read more