IFFS PLAY

To address climate change we need to reduce net emissions globally. Most international processes and frameworks have involved seeking to get countries to make cuts to their emissions. Net zero has recently emerged as a new norm, one in which different actors (including but not limited to countries) pledge to achieve a form of GHG neutrality—ensuring that they put no more carbon into the atmosphere than they take out— by a certain date. But given that actors can be related to emissions in different ways, it is not clear which emissions should be treated as belonging to their inventories. In this paper, we examine criteria, both existing and proposed, that might be used to determine which emissions should be regarded as belonging to different actors. We argue that all of them, taken on their own or in combination with others, are inadequate and we provide an underlying explanation of why this is so. We conclude by considering what responsible actors ought to do in light of this, given the emergence of net zero norms and the character of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Research seminar at the Institute for Futures Studies in Stockholm with Christian Barry, Professor of Philosophy at Australian National University.

Latest IFFS Play:

Published on Oct 29, 2022

Which emissions belong to us?

To address climate change we need to reduce net emissions globally. Most international processes and frameworks have involved seeking to get countries to make cuts to their emissions. Net zero has recently emerged as a new norm, one in which different actors (including but not limited to countries) pledge to achieve a form of GHG neutrality—ensuring that they put no more carbon into the atmosphere than they take out— by a certain date. But given that actors can be related to emissions in different ways, it is not clear which emissions should be treated as belonging to their inventories. In this paper, we examine criteria, both existing and proposed, that might be used to determine which emissions should be regarded as belonging to different actors. We argue that all of them, taken on their own or in combination with others, are inadequate and we provide an underlying explanation of why this is so. We conclude by considering what responsible actors ought to do in light of this, given the emergence of net zero norms and the character of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Research seminar at the Institute for Futures Studies in Stockholm with Christian Barry, Professor of Philosophy at Australian National University.

Search
Area
Load more